The Chinese version of the Caregiver Difficulties Scale: Psychometric evaluation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zhong, Xiaoying
dc.contributor.author Guo, Xiujing
dc.contributor.author Zhang, Li
dc.contributor.author Yang, Xiaorong
dc.contributor.author Jingyao, Chen
dc.contributor.author Li, Dehua
dc.contributor.author Chen, Xiaoyong
dc.contributor.author Zhou, Hui
dc.contributor.author Wijesinghe, Champa J.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-09-04T08:09:38Z
dc.date.available 2023-09-04T08:09:38Z
dc.date.issued 2022-12-29
dc.identifier.citation Zhong, X., Guo, X., Zhang, L., Yang, X., Jingyao, C., Li, D., Chen, X., Zhou, H., & Wijesinghe, C. J. (2023). The Chinese version of the Caregiver Difficulties Scale: Psychometric evaluation. Child: Care, Health and Development, 49(4), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.13093 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/14405
dc.description.abstract Background Evaluating caregiver burden and its health impact is an essential component of long-term care plan for children with disabilities; the Caregiver Difficulties Scale (CDS) has high conceptual sensitivity. The aim of this study was to adapt the CDS to Chinese and investigates the psychometric properties of this tool. Methods The study was carried out among caregivers of children with cerebral palsy (n = 194). The CDS, Caregivers Burden Inventory (CBI) and World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) were used for data collection. Twenty experts were consulted to evaluate the content validity of the scale. The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to measure the construct validity of CDS. The Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated among CDS, CBI and WHOQOL-BREF to examine the convergent validity and discriminant validity. The reliability was evaluated by examining internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Results The result of expert consultation showed that the S-CVI was 0.894 and the I-CVI ranged from 0.70 to 1.00. The fit indices showed that the original correlated four-factor model of CDS was adequate: χ2 = 268.397; df = 243; χ2/df = 1.105; RMSEA = 0.023; CFI = 0.985; NNFI = 0.869; TLI = 0.982; IFI = 0.986. The score of CDS was positively strong associated with the scores of CBI (r = +0.764); negatively correlating with the scores of WHOQOL-BREF (r = −0.627). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.840; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value was 0.843. Conclusions The Chinese version of the CDS is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate burden for caregivers of children with CP in China. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Child: Care Health & Development en_US
dc.title The Chinese version of the Caregiver Difficulties Scale: Psychometric evaluation en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account