Impact of Two Follow-up Schemes on Morbidity Management and Disability Prevention (MMDP) Programme for Filarial Lymphedema in Matara, Sri Lanka.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yahathugoda, T.C.
dc.contributor.author Weerasooriya, M.V.
dc.contributor.author Sandamali, Wilfred A.
dc.contributor.author Eisaku Kimura
dc.contributor.author Makoto Itoh
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-21T04:14:57Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-21T04:14:57Z
dc.date.issued 2018-04
dc.identifier.citation "Yahathugoda, T.C., Weerasooriya, M.V., Samarawickrema, W.A., Kimura, E., and Itoh, M. (2018). Impact of two follow-up schemes on morbidity management and disability prevention (MMDP) programme for filarial lymphedema in Matara, Sri Lanka. Parasitology International, 67(2),176-183." en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/handle/iruor/18924
dc.description.abstract Alleviating morbidity due to lymphatic filariasis (LF)-especially in elderly patients who are rather ignorant-is presently the biggest challenge for the national filariasis campaign. We introduced two follow-up schemes and compared each other to address three key programmatic issues (1) locating patients, (2) educating patients, family members on practice of lymphoedema self-care (3) well sustained daily self-care. Hundred and seven lymphoedema patients were introduced to the new Community Home Based Care (CHBC) programme as a part of MMDP programme at their homes. Twenty seven of 107 patients were selected by purposive sampling and followed-up under two schemes, 14 in Daily follow-up (DFU) scheme and 13 in Monthly follow-up (MFU) scheme. Impact was assessed using a KAP score, number of entry lesions (EL) and number of ADL episodes, limb volume, its appearance, changes in the quality of life and gained benefits. Visiting patients in their homes to introduce lymphoedema care programme was a success. KAP scores of the more important activities on lymphoedema care were significantly higher in DFU scheme. Number of patients (51.9%; 14/27) who had EL/s at baseline reduced significantly to 18.5% (5/27) at one year follow-up. The mean numbers of ADL episodes/year reduced significantly in both schemes. Six photographs of 27 showed obvious improvement in lymphoedema and its grade. Mean volume of lymphoedema reduced significantly in both schemes at one year no significant difference between schemes. Benefit score at one year revealed that the patients in DFU scheme received significantly higher amount of benefits compared to MFU scheme. In conclusion daily instruction has significantly motivated the patient and his/her family bringing a new hope. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elsevier en_US
dc.subject ADL en_US
dc.subject assessment of physical & psychological improvement en_US
dc.subject ELs en_US
dc.subject lymphatic filariasis en_US
dc.subject morbidity management en_US
dc.subject programmatic issues en_US
dc.title Impact of Two Follow-up Schemes on Morbidity Management and Disability Prevention (MMDP) Programme for Filarial Lymphedema in Matara, Sri Lanka. en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account