Evaluation of coconut flour incorporated muffin mix: Shelf-life evaluation with respect to chemical, sensory and microbial changes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Liyanaarachchi, L. S. N.
dc.contributor.author Yalegama, L. L. W. C.
dc.contributor.author Bandara, B. G. R. R.
dc.contributor.author Hunupolagama, D. M.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-19T10:30:27Z
dc.date.available 2025-11-19T10:30:27Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.citation Liyanaarachchi, L. S. N., Yalegama, L. L. W. C., Bandara, B. G. R. R. & Hunupolagama, D. M.(2025). Evaluation of coconut flour incorporated muffin mix: Shelf-life evaluation with respect to chemical, sensory and microbial changes, International Symposium on Agriculture and Environment, 101. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1800-4830
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/handle/iruor/20416
dc.description.abstract Defatted Desiccated Coconut Flour (DDCF) is a gluten-free, high-fiber, low-carbohydrate ingredient derived from virgin coconut oil production. This study evaluated the quality and shelf life of an instant muffin mix (IMM) containing 40% (w/w) DDCF and 60% (w/w) wheat flour (previously optimized formulation), stored in Kraft paper and aluminum pouches, compared to a control mix made with 100% wheat flour. Key components like moisture, ash, protein, fat and crude fiber were analyzed using AOAC methods. Over 42 days, changes in free fatty acids (FFA), peroxide values, microbial counts and moisture content were monitored. Sensory evaluation involved 30 semi-trained panelists using a 5-point hedonic scale, with data analyzed by one-way ANOVA in Minitab 22. The DDCF muffin mix contained higher moisture (6.87± 0.22%), protein (8.72 ± 0.00 %), fiber (1.03±0.18%), fat (1.31± 0.20 %) and ash (2.49± 0.06 %) than the control mix. After storage DDCF muffin mix, the FFA value was lower in the Kraft paper pouch (0.05 mg NaOH/g oil) than in the aluminum pouch (0.06 mg NaOH/g oil), both below the acceptable limit of <0.2 mg NaOH/g oil. At 42 days, moisture was higher in the aluminum pouch (5.95± 0.33 %) compared to the Kraft paper pouch (5.80± 0.60 %). Total plate counts were also higher in the aluminum pouch (6.01 × 102 CFU/g) than in the Kraft paper pouch (4.70 × 102 CFU/g), but both were below the standard limit of <104 CFU/g. Yeast and mold growth at 42 days was greater in the aluminum pouch (5.88 × 102 CFU/g) versus the Kraft paper pouch (5.40 × 102 CFU/g), remaining below the standard limit of 1 × 103 CFU/g. Peroxide values remained undetectable throughout the storage period. The DDCF muffin mix showed significantly better nutritional composition than the control mix, and a Kraft paper pouch is recommended for storage. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Agriculture -University of Ruhuna en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries ISAE;2025
dc.subject Coconut flour en_US
dc.subject Instant muffin mix en_US
dc.subject Packing materials en_US
dc.subject Shelf-life evaluation en_US
dc.title Evaluation of coconut flour incorporated muffin mix: Shelf-life evaluation with respect to chemical, sensory and microbial changes en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account