Screening of aromatic and non aromatic rice varieties for resistance to blast and bacterial leaf blight diseases

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kumara, K.L. Wasantha
dc.contributor.author Kusumalatha, L.G.
dc.contributor.author Pathirana, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-27T04:01:07Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-27T04:01:07Z
dc.date.issued 2008-10-23
dc.identifier.issn 1800-4830
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/12475
dc.description.abstract Rice, the staple food in many countries including Sri Lanka, is subjected to diseases that often place a major biological constraint on production. Among these diseases, blast caused by (Pyricularia grisea), and bacterial leaf blight caused by (Xanthoonas oryzae pv. oryzae) are grouped under the major important diseases in Sri Lanka. Non aromatic varieties have mostly grown in the country at present however, aromatic rice varieties have also gain the preference of consumers because of the associated flavour and high quality. Resistance, the most desirable control measure, has been investigated by researchers in several countries against important rice diseases. The objective of the study was to screen some aromatic and non aromatic rice varieties for resistance against blast and bacterial leaf blight diseases. Seven non aromatic rice varieties and four aromatic rice varieties were screened against blast disease along with the variety pachchiperumal as the susceptible check. Plants infected with blast disease (inoculum) spread over the net arranged test and infector blocks. Disease severity was assessed according to 1-4 scale. In another experiment, six non aromatic rice varieties including pachchiperumal as susceptible check and four aromatic rice varieties were screened for resistance to bacterial leaf blight (BLB) disease. Bacterial suspension was prepared by mixing pieces of infected leaves with water and plants at maximum tillering stage were inoculated by clipping method. Disease rating was done measuring the lesion length. Significant difference (P=0.05) was observed among tested varieties in their reaction against blast and BLB diseases. Variety puc hchiperumal was found susceptible to both blast and BLB diseases. Among aromatic varieties, line 28 ING was resistant to rice blast while lines 51/3 and 22/3 were found moderately resistant. LD-355, BW 267/3, RU 102, BG 379/2 and AT 354 were the non aromatic varieties resistance to blast. However, LD 356, a non aromatic variety was found moderately susceptible to rice blast. All the four aromatic varieties and all the non aromatic rice varieties except variety BJ-1, showed susceptible reaction with BLB disease en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject Aromatic Rice en_US
dc.subject Blast en_US
dc.subject BLB en_US
dc.subject Resistance Screening en_US
dc.title Screening of aromatic and non aromatic rice varieties for resistance to blast and bacterial leaf blight diseases en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account