Effectiveness of imposing maximum retail price for regulating the market price of rice: A case of Colombo and Gampaha districts in Sri Lanka

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Palitha Bandara, S.M.S.
dc.contributor.author Samaraweera, G.C.
dc.contributor.author Gunawardana, T.S.L.W.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-07-17T09:29:16Z
dc.date.available 2023-07-17T09:29:16Z
dc.date.issued 2018-05-18
dc.identifier.issn 1800-4830
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/13703
dc.description.abstract The artificial creation of rice scarcity and the unusual price increase harm the consumers and make frequent complaints against large-scale millers for earning excessive profit. In order to stabilize and regulate the price in the market, the government imposed a maximum retail price (MRP), and that retail market price ≤ MRP if the imposed MRP is effectively implemented. However, the effectiveness of this in order to regulate the rice price in the market is quite questionable, as very limited literature has discussed this issue yet. Hence, the purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of imposing MRP to regulate the price of rice in the market in the Colombo and Gampaha districts. Secondary data on the average monthly retail price (AMRP) and the imposed MRP values were used in this research. The AMRP of the main four rice types; Long grain white (LGW), Short grain white (SGW), White raw (WR), and Red raw (RR) used in this study. One sample t-test through SPSS software was used to analyze the significance. The deviation (Deviation = AMRP - MRP) between the AMRP and the MRP was calculated from the year 2015 to 2021. Results of the one-sample t-test showed that the AMRP from 2015 to 2021 is significantly higher than imposed MRP in all four rice types. In the analysis of deviation out of the considered 84 months, AMRP showed a positive deviation in SGW and LGW except for March, April, and May 2020. WR showed a positive deviation except for May 2016 and August 2015 and RR showed a positive deviation except in May 2016. Accordingly, the present study proved that the imposed MRP has not regulated the market price. However, the AMRP in the market may vary with the availability of rice and the marketing strategies used by key players. The increase in the AMRP of rice than the MRP indicated that the appropriate actions such as regulatory mechanisms and legal actions have not been implemented by the respective parties. Therefore, the policymakers should identify the limitation in imposing MRP and need prompt action to successfully enforce MRP to regulate market prices in Sri Lanka. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries ISAE;2023
dc.subject Excessive profit en_US
dc.subject Maximum retail price en_US
dc.subject Mean monthly retail price en_US
dc.subject rice scarcity en_US
dc.title Effectiveness of imposing maximum retail price for regulating the market price of rice: A case of Colombo and Gampaha districts in Sri Lanka en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account