Pre-analytical Errors in the Hematology Laboratory of Teaching Hospital Rathnapura: A Cross-sectional Study.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Somasiri, B.G.P.D.
dc.contributor.author Gunarathne, D.N.N.
dc.contributor.author Vivitharani, M.
dc.contributor.author Shiffana, S.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-10-30T06:35:55Z
dc.date.available 2024-10-30T06:35:55Z
dc.date.issued 2024-07-05
dc.identifier.citation Somasiri, B.G.P.D., Gunarathne, D.N.N., Vivitharani, M. & Shiffana, S. (2024). Pre-analytical Errors in the Hematology Laboratory of Teaching Hospital Rathnapura: A Cross-sectional Study. Proceedings of the 2nd International Research Symposium of the Faculty of Allied Health Sciences University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka, 124. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2659-2029
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/handle/iruor/18329
dc.description.abstract Background: A precise and accurate of laboratory report is essential for guiding towards better clinical decisions. Laboratory errors can cause delays in diagnosis and treatment. The pre analytical phase, defined as the period from patient preparation through sample collection, transportation, and storage until the beginning of the analytical phase, is particularly prone to errors. Pre-analytical errors (PEs) are the most common type of errors in the Total Testing Process (TTP), accounting for about 70% of total laboratory errors. Objective: To assess the PEs in the haematology laboratory in teaching hospital Rathnapura Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted involving 21 600 samples from inpatient departments (IPD), received to the sample receiving counter of the haematology laboratory at teaching hospital Rathnapura. Results were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Chi-Square test was used to determine the significance among the variables using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Clotted samples, insufficient samples, over volume samples, insufficient details, diluted, non-sample decomposed, haemolysed samples, incorrect details, without request forms, incorrect containers, incorrect samples, no label on samples were found as the PEs. The overall percentage of PE was 2.81% (607/21600). Among these, the most frequent error was clotted samples (2.02%, 437/21600) followed by insufficient samples (0.36%, 79/21600). The least issue was no proper labeling (0.004%). The majority of PEs were reported from medical (1.23%) and surgical (0.51%) wards among IPD. However, there was no statistical significance among the wards (p=0.153). Among the tests requested by IPD, full blood count was the most frequently rejected test due to clotting. The sample population was evenly distributed among gender. The highest incidence of PEs was reported for the samples of the patients aged 55-74 years. Conclusion: Clotted samples and insufficient samples are the most commonly observed PEs, which are identified in the medical and surgical wards. The staffs who are engaged in collection, transportation and handling of the specimens should be well trained to reduce or minimize those errors. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher FAHS en_US
dc.subject Error en_US
dc.subject Haematology en_US
dc.subject Laboratory en_US
dc.subject Pre-analytical en_US
dc.subject Total testing process en_US
dc.title Pre-analytical Errors in the Hematology Laboratory of Teaching Hospital Rathnapura: A Cross-sectional Study. en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account