A comparison of partition of unity finite element method and finite volume technique for solving 1-D heat conduction problems

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Edirisinghe, E.D.K.I.S.
dc.contributor.author Jayantha, P.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-16T04:01:25Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-16T04:01:25Z
dc.date.issued 2022-01-19
dc.identifier.issn 1391-8796
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/5555
dc.description.abstract The scope of this research concerns with the numerical methods used for solving one-dimensional partial differential equations. It is motivated by the need for efficient numerical methods to deal with partial differential equations that are difficult to solve using analytical approaches. Among those numerical methods, the Finite Difference Method (FDM) is the simplest method, and the Finite Volume Method (FVM) is generally expected to provide better conservation properties. Also, the Partition of Unity Finite Element Method (PUFEM) has been identified as an extremely powerful new numerical method which deals with overlapping subdomains. In this study, we examined the PUFEM and FVM to see whether they produced equivalent numerical solutions. We considered two problems namely, a steady-state heat conduction problem and an unsteady state heat conduction problem when Dirichlet boundary conditions are given, for this study. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Science, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject Partition of unity finite element method en_US
dc.subject Finite volume method en_US
dc.subject Finite difference method en_US
dc.subject Steady en_US
dc.subject Unsteady en_US
dc.subject Heat conduction en_US
dc.title A comparison of partition of unity finite element method and finite volume technique for solving 1-D heat conduction problems en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account