Farmers’ Perception towards Government Intervention in Paddy Purchasing Process: Case Study in Ambalantota DS Division of Hambantota District, Sri Lanka

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Madhushani, V.P.R.
dc.contributor.author Bandara, S.M.S.P.
dc.contributor.author Bandara, W.B.K.
dc.contributor.author Samaraweera, G.C.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-08T07:26:20Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-08T07:26:20Z
dc.date.issued 2020-02-14
dc.identifier.issn 1800-4830
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/7262
dc.description.abstract This study mainly focused to disclose the farmers’ perception towards government intervention in paddy purchasing, exploring the present situation of paddy marketing and assessing benefits and challenges of Paddy Marketing Board (PMB). The primary data were collected by using a pre-tested questionnaire from randomly selected 150 paddy farmers in Ambalantota divisional secretariat (DS). Data were analysed by using parametric and non-parametric statistical methods and descriptive statistics. Key findings revealed that paddy farmers’ perception was negative towards government intervention in paddy marketing (z= -2.67, p<0.05). The choice of paddy selling agency was significantly influenced by farmer’s experience in paddy farming and availability of transport facilities (X2 =10.808, p<0.05 and X2 = 93.204, p<0.05, respectively). Majority of farmers (85%) have refused to sell their paddy to the paddy marketing board. Farmers have stated negative agreement with current ceiling price of paddy (z= -9.962, p<0.05). Study further revealed that PMB is significantly more beneficial than private agencies due to higher guaranteed price for paddy (t= 10.57, p<0.05), linkage with government (t= 15.439, p<0.05) and restriction of the intervention by third parties (t= 8.901, p<0.05). According to the respondents, main challenges faced by PMB were, (a) high quality maintaining cost (t=-22.73, p<0.05), (b) limited purchasing (t=-155.45, p< 0.05), (c) documentary (t=-22.98, p<0.05), (d) purchasing period (t=-6.985, p<0.05), (e) high weight losses after drying (t=-18.224, p<0.05), (f) time consumption (t=-14.392, p<0.05), (g) inconvenience for cleaning and drying paddy (t=- 14.238, p<0.05), (h) quick cash accessibility (t= -3.417, p<0.05) and (i) transport facilities (t=- 8.769, p<0.05). Key suggestions from farmers in order to improve the government intervention in paddy marketing were providing transport costs (75%), accepting higher moisture level of paddy at purchasing (72%) and increasing purchasing quantity (63%). It is recommended to launch awareness programmes on the importance of quality maintenance in paddy, establish drying beds in purchasing centres to maintain quality and provide moisture meter to farmer organization, establish local purchasing centres at village level to reduce the transport cost and utilize IT facilities to reduce unnecessary documentation and to enhance quick payment method. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries ISAE;2020
dc.subject Farmers’ perception en_US
dc.subject Government intervention en_US
dc.subject Paddy marketing en_US
dc.title Farmers’ Perception towards Government Intervention in Paddy Purchasing Process: Case Study in Ambalantota DS Division of Hambantota District, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account