Epiphyton in Agricultural Streams: Structural Control and Comparison to Epilithon

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wijewardene, L.
dc.contributor.author Wu, N.
dc.contributor.author Giménez-Grau, P.
dc.contributor.author Holmboe, C.
dc.contributor.author Fohrer, N.
dc.contributor.author Baattrup-Pedersen, A.
dc.contributor.author Riis, T.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-09T03:39:57Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-09T03:39:57Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12-04
dc.identifier.citation Wijewardene, L., Wu, N., Giménez-Grau, P., Holmboe, C., Fohrer, N., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., & Riis, T. (2021). Epiphyton in agricultural streams: structural control and comparison to epilithon. Water, 13(23), 3443. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2073-4441
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/9147
dc.description.abstract Stream biofilms play an important role in the structure, functioning, and integrity of agricultural streams. In many lowland streams, macrophyte vegetation is abundant and functions as an important substrate for biofilm (epiphyton) in addition to the gravel and stone substrate for epilithon on the stream bed. We expect that reach-scale habitat conditions in streams (e.g., nutrient availability, hydraulic conditions) affect the epiphyton and epilithon biomass and composition, and that this effect will be substrate-specific (macrophytes and stones). The objectives of our study were (i) to describe concurrent changes in epiphyton and epilithon biomass and composition over a year in agricultural streams, and (ii) to determine the substrate specific reach-scale habitat drivers for the epiphyton and epilithon structure. We monitored epiphyton and epilithon biofilm biomass and composition at three-week intervals and reach-scale environmental conditions daily during a year for two agricultural steams. The results showed that epiphyton and epilithon communities differed in biomass, having high substrate specific biomass in epilithon compared to epiphyton. Epiphyton was mainly composed of diatom and green algae, while cyanobacteria were more important in epilithon, and the diatom species composition varied between the two biofilm types. Epiphyton structural properties were less influenced by reach-scale hydrology and nutrient availability compared to epilithon. The overall explanatory power of the measured environmental variables was low, probably due to micro-scale habitat effects and interactive processes within stream biofilms. Knowledge of biofilm control in agricultural streams is important in order to improve management strategies, and future studies should improve the understanding of micro-scale habitat conditions, interactive relationships within biofilms and between the biofilm and the substrates. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Water, MDPI en_US
dc.subject Stream biofilms en_US
dc.subject Biomass en_US
dc.subject Algal composition en_US
dc.subject Hydrology en_US
dc.subject Nutrients en_US
dc.subject Macrophytes en_US
dc.title Epiphyton in Agricultural Streams: Structural Control and Comparison to Epilithon en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account