Comparison of the antibacterial activity between essential oils of Citrus crenatifolia and Citrus sinensis against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Weerakoon, W.A.H.C.B.
dc.contributor.author Wettasinghe, W.A.D.L.
dc.contributor.author Amarasekara, C.I.
dc.contributor.author Denagamagei, S.S.
dc.contributor.author Udalamaththa, V.
dc.contributor.author Karunarathne, S.R.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-21T06:27:52Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-21T06:27:52Z
dc.date.issued 2022-11-02
dc.identifier.isbn 978-624-5553-34-1
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/9416
dc.description.abstract The emergence of antimicrobial resistance and the frequent side effects of antibiotics has become a major global health concern. To combat this, natural plant-based products are considered to play a key role. This study aimed to determine the antibacterial activity of Citrus crenatifolia and Citrus sinensis essential oils and to investigate the synergism or antagonism of their combinations against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Escherichia coli bacterial species. The leaves of C. crenatifolia and C. sinensis, collected from Yakkaduwa Herbal Garden, were cut into small pieces and subjected to hydrodistillation using a Clevenger-type apparatus. The Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion method was used to test the antimicrobial susceptibility of pure essential oils of the two citrus plants and their combination (1:1 ratio). As positive controls, 0.1mg/mL for B. cereus and 0.01mg/mL of Amoxicillin for S. aureus and E. coli were used. According to the results, C. crenatifolia demonstrated statistically significant results against B. cereus (p = 0.0072974 vs S. aureus and p = 0.042552 vs E. coli). E. coli was the most susceptible bacterial strain for C. sinensis and the C. crenatifolia – C. sinensis combination. These could be due to the interaction of various bioactive compounds binding specifically to different cellular targets in the bacterial cell wall and possible synergistic or antagonistic effects. S. aureus was the least susceptible bacterial strain except for C. sinensis indicating antibacterial resistance. In conclusion, all three bacterial strains were susceptible to C. crenatifolia, and the combination was most effective against E. coli compared to Amoxicillin. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship AHEAD and FSPI – SEDRIC Project en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Ruhuna Science Research Circle, Faculty of Science, University of Ruhuna en_US
dc.subject Antibacterial activity en_US
dc.subject Citrus crenatifolia en_US
dc.subject Citrus plants en_US
dc.subject Citrus sinensis en_US
dc.subject Essential oils en_US
dc.title Comparison of the antibacterial activity between essential oils of Citrus crenatifolia and Citrus sinensis against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account