Abstract:
In the context of soaring challenges emanating from climate change and rising global exposure to disasters, this research aims to thoroughly review Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) strategies. For review purposes, we used the PRISMA approach; our article conducts a systematic review of the preceding literature on various DRR interventions. The general aim is to provide a consolidated framework highlighting sustainable development, community engagement, and innovative technologies. To conduct this systematic review, the research examined 21 articles (2020-2023) selected in accordance with the keywords of “DRR”, “Community Resilience”, “Sustainable Development”, and “Innovative Technologies”. Studies met initial selection criteria undergo an assessment of quality and relevancy, which eases retrieving the needed data for meta-analysis or thematic synthesis. The study classifies interventions according to type and location and addresses the qualitative dimensions of community resilience. This study has diverse implications. Firstly, a conclusive systematic review article that provides an overview of the available literature and pinpoints major lacunae for future research. Secondly, research leads to formulating a unifying framework for DRR strategies that policymakers and practitioners can use as a practical reference. This framework highlights the importance of community participation and technological advances in strengthening communities against disaster risks. The research draws up a collection of case studies involving effective DRR measures highlighting innovative technologies. These case studies are examples of practical results, with specific lessons for communities addressing issues. This study’s transparency through reporting clearly represents the selection procedure, which aims to benefit stakeholders involved in disaster preparedness processes. This review advances the debate about DRR while trying to connect theory and practice. In advocating for holistic sustainability, for a future whereby communities are no longer passive bystanders to disasters.
