A comparative assessment of fruit components of recommended coconut (cocos nucifera l.) cultivars in Sri Lanka

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Thilakarathne, M.G.O.S.
dc.contributor.author Senanayake, P.S.W.L.
dc.contributor.author Bandara, B.G.R.R.
dc.contributor.author Liyanage, W.L.A.M.
dc.contributor.author Dissanayake, H.D.M.A.C.
dc.contributor.author Warnasooriya, W.M.R.S.K.
dc.contributor.author Samarasinghe, C.R.K.
dc.contributor.author Weerasinghe, P.R.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-01-07T10:15:52Z
dc.date.available 2026-01-07T10:15:52Z
dc.date.issued 2025-12-31
dc.identifier.citation Thilakarathne, M.G.O.S., Senanayake, P.S.W.L., Bandara, B.G.R.R., Liyanage, W.L.A.M., Dissanayake, H.D.M.A.C., Warnasooriya, W.M.R.S.K. , Samarasinghe, C.R.K. & Weerasinghe, P.R.(2025). A comparative assessment of fruit components of recommended coconut (cocos nucifera l.) cultivars in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Tropical Agricultural Research & Extension, 28(4), 257-264 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1391-3646
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/handle/iruor/20553
dc.description.abstract The coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) is one of the major plantation crops in Sri Lanka, which contributes to both local consumption and export income generation. The recommended coconut cultivars (RCC) play a major role in that, providing higher nut production. The absence of information on dry matter (DM), crude fat (CF) of the kernels, coconut milk yield (CMY), and total solids of coconut milk (TS) in the RCC has created a knowledge gap in identifying specific cultivars for better end use. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to conduct a comparative fruit component analysis that measures all of the above parameters. The studied materials were CRIC60, CRIC65, CRISL98, CRISL2004, CRISL2012, CRISL2013, and CRISL2020. Six fully matured nuts were collected from six palms of each variety at the Raddegoda Estate, Kurunegala, Intermediate zone. Measurement included weights of the fresh nuts (FNW), de-husked nuts (DNW), husk (HW), shell (SW), kernel (KW), nut water (WW), DM, and CF content of the kernel. After that, CMY content per nut and unit fresh weight of kernel were assessed and followed by the measurement of TS. Experiments were arranged in a CRD with one-way ANOVA. Means were compared using Tukey’s test at α = 0.05. The highest FNW, DNW, SW, and KW were observed in CRISL98. There was no significant difference for the DM%, CF%, CMY per unit fresh kernel weight, and TS% in CM. CRISL98 stands out with the highest CMY per nut. Overall, the results indicate that CRISL98 is the best option in terms of per-nut value. However, as there are no significant differences in unit weight or percentage values of DM, CF, CMY per unit fresh kernel weight and TS, each cultivar has equal potential to use in any end use. This is the first study to report all these components in RCC in Sri Lanka. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Agriculture -University of Ruhuna en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries TARE;2025
dc.subject Cultivar evaluation en_US
dc.subject Crude fat en_US
dc.subject Coconut milk yield en_US
dc.subject Kernel attributes en_US
dc.title A comparative assessment of fruit components of recommended coconut (cocos nucifera l.) cultivars in Sri Lanka en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account