Abstract:
Farmers extremely rely on usage of synthetic pesticide in high yielding cropping systems in
developing countries. Therefore, there is an urgent need to adopt integrated pest management
(IPM) practices in crops cultivation as a safe and sound technique for human health, household
economy and environment worldwide. Empirical background evidences show that influencing
farmers to adopt IPM practices does not have effect on its adoption. Several studies reported
that adoption rate is affected by different reasons. Therefore, this study aimed to identify factors
affecting on adoption of IPM practices in vegetable cultivation, pesticides usage pattern and
opportunities to influence farmers for adoption of IPM practices in Hambantota district, Sri
Lanka. Primary data were collected through a questionnaire survey. Based on the Raosoft web
based sampling calculator, sample size was decided as 194 vegetable farmers. Cluster sampling
procedure was assigned to select the most suitable areas for the study. Respondents from each
cluster were randomly drown to the sample and face to face interviewed. Adoption level was
measured by developing adoption score and socio economic factors were tested through
stepwise regression to identify factors affecting adoption level. Results indicated that factors of
knowledge on IPM and awareness on negative impact of use of heavy synthetic pesticides
positively affected IPM adoption level. Further, income through farming and farmers’ attitudes
negatively affected IPM adoption level. However cultivated extent and interaction with
extension officer were also about to significant (p- value = 0.051 and 0.053, respectively)
although they did not considered in the equation. In terms of pesticides usage pattern, 56% of
the farmers applied synthetic pesticide even at the pest population is minimum and frequency of
application was ranged from 3 to 18 in average and 10 to 40 in maximum with disparities among
different crops. Only 5% of farmers were well aware about IPM, though adoption level was
moderate. Opportunities are still there to increase adoption level by long-term mechanism that
linked extension officers and farmers through different approaches. Continuing demonstration
cultivation for every isolated areas, providing quick access for updated knowledge, facilitate
extension officers for continuous field supervision were priorities among those approaches as
supplements for the available programs.
