Pedagogical Versus Andragogical Learning Patterns Reflected in Artificial Intelligence Use Among Allied Health Undergraduates at the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tharuka, K.D.T.
dc.contributor.author Karunanayake, A.
dc.contributor.author Pathiraja, V.M.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-08-25T09:53:37Z
dc.date.available 2026-08-25T09:53:37Z
dc.date.issued 2026-03-04
dc.identifier.citation A en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2362-0412
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/handle/iruor/21677
dc.description.abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing health professions education, yet the extent to which positive student perceptions translate into routine educational use remains unclear, particularly within a pedagogy and andragogy framework in low- and middle-income settings. To identify independent predictors of high-frequency educational AI use among allied health undergraduates at the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka.A descriptive cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 278 undergraduates from the Departments of Nursing, Pharmacy, and Medical Laboratory Science. A pretested questionnaire assessed demographics, knowledge, attitudes, practices, barriers, and ethical concerns related to AI. Binary logistic regression determined independent predictors of high-frequency educational AI use, adjusting for gender, formal AI education, knowledge level, academic year, and department. Learning orientation was not measured separately but inferred from patterns of autonomous AI use versus nonuse, consistent with adult learning theory.Although 51.4% of students reported adequate AI knowledge and 86.7% perceived AI as beneficial, educational AI use remained limited. Nearly half (48.6%) reported no academic AI use, and only 5.4% used AI daily. The most common barriers were lack of skill (79.3%) and limited resources (61.1%). In the adjusted model, gender was the only significant independent predictor. Male students had approximately two-fold higher odds of frequent educational AI use than females (OR = 2.05; 95% CI:1.12 to 3.75; p = 0.020). Other variables were not significant. Positive perceptions and perceived knowledge of AI did not translate into autonomous educational practice, revealing an attitude-practice gap. Frequent self-initiated AI use was interpreted as a proxy for andragogical learning, whereas low or absent use reflected reliance on pedagogically structured learning. Skill-focused, autonomy-supportive, and gender-sensitive strategies are essential to promote equitable and effective AI integration in allied health education. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Engineering , University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka. en_US
dc.subject Artificial intelligence en_US
dc.subject Allied health education en_US
dc.subject Pedagogy en_US
dc.subject Andragogy en_US
dc.subject Educational technology en_US
dc.subject Sri Lanka en_US
dc.title Pedagogical Versus Andragogical Learning Patterns Reflected in Artificial Intelligence Use Among Allied Health Undergraduates at the University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka. en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account