THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BUDDHIST JURISPRUDENCE AND PUNISHMENTS

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sankichcha, K
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-22T10:16:49Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-22T10:16:49Z
dc.date.issued 2021-11-25
dc.identifier.issn 28150414
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/10018
dc.description.abstract Law is a great elucidation of the role of a government. The fundamental concepts of law are establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes, and protecting liberty and rights. A government is made up of the power of the people of a particular country because a government should be supportive of the people. Law is common to all and everyone is to be served equally by law enforcers. The purpose of this paper is to identify the democracy of Buddhist jurisprudence and punishments, as well as the equality and specifications of Buddhist punishments. The problem discussed in the paper is to create awareness of what the true purpose of the present law is. Under the qualitative methodology, the canon and commentaries are used. The principle which was needed to follow in promulgating Vinaya rules had been maintained meticulously as mentioned in the canon. The law does not exist for the law itself, but for the sake of the people. This is somewhat different in the Roman and Dutch law which is in existence in Sri Lanka. Even baseless obligations can put someone into court and punish. The Supreme Court has the power to put someone into jail even when there is no complete evidence available. Many people have been sentenced to death and life imprisonment without a reason. The system of penalties the Buddha worked out for the rules is based on two principles. The first one is training that aims primarily at the development of the mind. The second principle used in determining penalties is based on the Buddha’s observation of Ven. Ānanda. The punishments can only be enforced if there are acceptable pieces of evidence, and if the accuser accepts the offense he or she has committed. Discipline is for the sake of restraint. Restraint is for the sake of getting freedom from remorse. Democracy is a depiction of Buddhist jurisprudence and punishments. There is a great attitude in the Buddhist Vinaya; the condemned one is also accepted as a worthy person for the company after he is tamed properly. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Department of Pali and Buddhist Studies, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject Canon en_US
dc.subject Discipline en_US
dc.subject Jurisprudence en_US
dc.subject Punishment, en_US
dc.subject Restraint en_US
dc.title THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BUDDHIST JURISPRUDENCE AND PUNISHMENTS en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account