Abstract:
It is obvious that the Buddha never made it difficult for anybody to enter into the
Buddhist Order or made it difficult to be followed by the entered members, as he
promulgated the rules with the best wishes for the Order and its members. It can be
seen in the promulgation of Buddhist monastic codes in the Pātimokkha and its
Vibhaṅga. Concerning this, S. Dutt points out that the Buddha, the promulgator of
laws, was not any historical figure but only the conceptual embodiment of the formal
sources of all Buddhist laws and doctrines (Early Buddhist Monachism, 1996).
Venerable Wapola Rahula also comments that the Buddha never thought of
controlling the Saṅgha, nor did he want the Saṅgha to depend on him (What the
Buddha Thought, 1959). It is the principle of individual responsibility that the
Buddha consents his disciples to get freedom in Vinaya promulgation. On this
ground, it is necessary to examine how the Buddha formulated his laws and managed
his followers who lived in scattered locations. This research theoretically examined
the promulgation of monastic codes and demonstrated the Buddha’s decentralisation
and its resultant advantages. As the study approach, a textual analysis was done with
the limitation of the Pātimokkha and its Vibhaṅga. Following this method, I
examined the promulgations and constitutions of Buddhist laws, and illustrated the
decentralisation of Buddha and his elder disciples as well. As a result, it could be
asserted that for the entire Order there would be several benefits of decentralisation
in the promulgation of Buddhist monastic codes, which are not just own personal
adjudications of the Buddha as a leader, even though he was the overall leader of the
entire Order