Leadership in new Millenium

Abstract

Perhaps the most common assumption executives make is that authority is somehow the bedrock of leadership - “ you” follow because, I am the leader, in an industrial, or in the military hierarchy works - or soldiers perform elemental tasks. The job of leader in those kinds of system was to be the task master. Although almost every one seems to agree that leadership involves an in fluence process, deferences tend to center around from management. The latter issue has been a particularly heated topic of debate in recent years, with most experts arguing that leadership and management are different. “ Leadership as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals” (Stephen p. Robbins) ~ The leader was the person who knew what needed doing and decided who would do what people were given leadership roles because it was presumed that they knew more than anyone else. In term, they thought their job was to tell people what to do, how to do it, and why do it. There was a certain macho style that characterized the image of the effective leader. But that hierarchical would barely today. The future demand that workers must be more than mechanical elements in production and leaders must be more than order givens. Today and in the future, each works will bring a set of unique skills, insight, and knowledge to the team in some cases, much more than the leader dose. The takes of future leaders is to orchestrate team, talents toward competitive ends, not exercise their authoritarian proclivities. Leadership is not authority, nor is it power. Leadership Is best understood as a verb as what happens when secure self knowledge team vision listed below are some prescriptions for leadership in the new millennium.