Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Among Healthcare Professionals in Sri Lanka- A Cross Sectional Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Madhushika, M. T.
dc.contributor.author Jayasinghe, S. S.
dc.contributor.author Liyanage, P. L. G. C.
dc.contributor.author Malinda, W. A. D.
dc.contributor.author Abeykoon, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-01-08T06:39:47Z
dc.date.available 2024-01-08T06:39:47Z
dc.date.issued 2023-09-09
dc.identifier.citation Thilini Madhushika M, Jayasinghe SS, Liyanage PGC, Dilan Malinda WA, Abeykoon P. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Among Healthcare Professionals in Sri Lanka- A Cross Sectional Study. Hospital Pharmacy. 2023;0(0). doi:10.1177/00185787231194988 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0018-5787
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/15830
dc.description.abstract Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) reporting among healthcare professionals at Teaching Hospital Karapitiya (THK), a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at THK. The healthcare professionals working in THK who were available during the study period were invited to the study. A self-administered pre-tested questionnaire was administered to the participants. Respondents were evaluated for their knowledge, attitudes and practices related to ADR reporting. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Results: Of the total 444 respondents, 31% were doctors and 69% were nurses. The majority of respondents, 90% (n = 400) were aware of the term ADR, while 64.8% (n = 288) could correctly define it. Among the respondents, 30.8% (n = 137) knew about the types of ADR and only 15.5% (n = 70) were able to mention a drug that is banned due to ADR correctly. Among the respondents, only 38.7% (n = 172) were aware of a formal process of reporting ADR and, only 35.3% (n = 157) stated that they had seen the ADR reporting form. Further, only 33.7% (n = 150) respondents have recognized ADR during their clinical practice and only a small proportion 18.2% (n = 81) have ever reported an ADR during their practice. Regarding attitudes toward ADR reporting, overall 84.1 (n = 373) had positive attitudes toward ADR reporting, while 13.54% (n = 60) of them stayed neutral and 2.25% (n = 10) had negative attitudes toward ADR reporting. Conclusions: Although the majority were aware of ADR, the knowledge and practices regarding spontaneous reporting of ADR are inadequate. However, most respondents have shown a positive attitude toward ADR reporting. A sincere and sustained effort should be made by concerned bodies to enhance the healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ADR reporting. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher SAGA Publication en_US
dc.subject Adverse Drug reactions en_US
dc.subject Knowledge en_US
dc.subject attitude and practice en_US
dc.subject health care professionals en_US
dc.subject ADR reporting en_US
dc.title Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Among Healthcare Professionals in Sri Lanka- A Cross Sectional Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account