COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS COUNTERFACTUALS: AN OVERVIEW OF POSTHARVEST VALUE CHAIN ACTORS IN NIGERIA

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Adegbola, JA
dc.contributor.author Owojaiye, OB
dc.contributor.author Ogunremi, OB
dc.contributor.author Aina, OB
dc.contributor.author Achime, KC
dc.contributor.author Lijoka, KO
dc.contributor.author Pessu, PO
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-27T07:59:21Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-27T07:59:21Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Adegbola, J. A., Owojaiye, O. B., Ogunremi, O. B., Aina, O. B., Achime, K. C., Lijoka, K. O., & Pessu, P. O. (2022). Covid-19 restrictions counterfactuals: an overview of postharvest value chain actors in Nigeria. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension, 25(4). en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/iruor/16162
dc.description.abstract This investigation is borne out of the assumption that postharvest value chain actors experienced disruptions which are fallouts of the COVID-19 restrictions or otherwise. It examines the degree to which changes in livelihood and activities of postharvest value chain actors (farmers, processors, marketers, transporters and consumers) may be attributed to restrictions or the inter-play of intervening factors. The study is cross-sectional and employed the micro approach as its estimation methodology in 18 states across 6 geopolitical zones of the country. Data were obtained through key informant interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), questionnaires and interview guides. The purposive selection of 16 states with a high incidence of COVID-19 according to the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) and formal restriction along with 2 states with no formal restriction as counterfactual preceded the random selection of 108,000 respondents across 5 categories of postharvest value chain actors from sampling frame provided by Agricultural Development Programme (ADP). Data components were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Results showed that the difference in earnings was significant (P ≤ 0.05) in restriction states but not significant (P ≤ 0.05) in counterfactual states; the difference in expenditure on food was not significant (P ≤ 0.05) in both restriction and counterfactual states; the difference in wages paid to work hands was not significant (P ≤ 0.05) in both restriction and the Cross-River States, however, it was in Kogi State; the difference in number of work hands employed was significant (P ≤ 0.05) in restriction States but not significant (P ≤ 0.05) in counterfactual states. This implies that the restrictions affected Nigerians in general irrespective of their restriction statuses because the effects of COVID-19 2restrictions in 34 states and the FCT overshadowed the non-restrictions in 2 states. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna, Sri Lanka en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries TARE;
dc.subject Expenditure en_US
dc.subject Expenditure en_US
dc.subject Income en_US
dc.subject Livelihood en_US
dc.subject Pandemic en_US
dc.subject Postharvest activities en_US
dc.title COVID-19 RESTRICTIONS COUNTERFACTUALS: AN OVERVIEW OF POSTHARVEST VALUE CHAIN ACTORS IN NIGERIA en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account