Abstract:
The American Library Association defines information literacy as a set of abilities requiring
individuals to "recognize when information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate,
and use effectively the needed information". Information literacy is a survival skill in the
information Age. The development of Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) has improvecTthe
visibility and access to the information sources in libraries. For effective utilization of this online
database of the resources held in a library, users must have an understanding of its structure and
facilities and be skilled to use them. The library OPAC at University of Ruhuna provides the
users with a number of advanced search options, as well as additional functionality, such as:
seeing the items checked out, and on-line renewal of library books through “Your Account”
option. To use these functions users are required to be competent in defining the information
need, identifying key words, designing search strategies and using common functions in
different OPAC interfaces. The purpose of this study was to investigate how undergraduates are
experiencing information literacy competency, while using the OPAC to locate information
sources in the library. The study was conducted at the main library, University of Ruhuna. A
stratified random sample of undergraduates visiting the main library was taken representing the
disciplines arts, science, fisheries science and management. Survey method was utilized for the
study. Out of the 200 structured questionnaires distributed, 129 were returned giving a return
rate of 64.5%. Data were analysed using SPSS version 16.0. Findings showed that more than
half of the respondents (55.9%) had the experience of OPAC searching before reaching library
shelves. Only 22.1% had the behaviour of always searching the OPAC for locating library
resources. It was found that a majority of respondents (71.3 %) had experienced difficulties
during overall OPAC search process. Findings further revealed that the respondents were not
confident in experiencing information literacy competencies of being able to define information
need for identifying key words (50.6%), being able to locate information; using simple search
(40.9%), using multiple search options in advanced search (55.6%), using quick limitations
(63.9%), revising search strategy for finding more relevent materials (59.5%), and being able to
evaluate information sources; selecting relevent library resources from the result list (40.3%),
and the skill of using additional facilities of library OPAC; managing “Your Account
Functions” (67.9%). Results of the Pearson Chi-Square test (x=8.170, P=0.517) shows that there
is no statistically significant association between being unconfident in OPAC search process and
not using OPAC. The study concludes that improving related information literacy competency is
important for making undergraduates confident in OPAC use. Furthermore, there must be
several other factors affecting undergraduates’ behavior of not using OPAC. Hence, the study
recommends future actions to extend information literacy education programs addressing these
competency needs of undergraduates, whilst providing training facilities on the identified
competency areas, using new technologies such as online videos and helpful web pages. Further
research is needed to identify other factors affecting undergraduates’ behaviour of reaching the
library shelves without searching the library catalogue.